[address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Fri Dec 14 23:39:54 CET 2012
On 14/12/2012 21:38, Dan Luedtke wrote: > I strongly support this proposal! > We had this problem more than once, and this is a good solution. > >> 1) A month can be anything between 28 and 31 days so I would have >> preferred a clearer statement. But this a problem in general and I am >> certain RIPE will follow this in a pragmatic way. > +1 clearer statement Thanks for the comment (and for supporting the proposal). From what I understand, the RIPE NCC has a procedure of defining a "month" calendar months unless otherwise specified. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]