[address-policy-wg] 2010-06 New Draft and Impact Analysis Document Published (Revert 'Run Out Fairly')

I support this proposal.  I see no need to discuss assignment
vs allocation periods since the depletion prevents further allocations.
I see this proposal as a way to bring back sense in the assignments that
the LIRs are able to make from the address space they currently hold.


Rgds Nina Bargisen

TDC dk.teledanmark


On 31.10.2012 15:50:21 +0200, George Giannousopoulos wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I agree that the three months limitation has to go..
> However, I also believe that the period for allocations and assignments
> should be equal
> 
> Best regards
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Dear Colleagues,
> >
> >
> > The draft document for the version 2.0 of the policy proposal
> > 2010-06,"Revert 'Run Out Fairly'" has been published. The impact
> > analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published.
> >
> > The changes in the version 2.0 are in the Title, Summary and
> > Rationale. They are purely editorial and reflect that the depletion is
> > no longer a future event.
> >
> >
> >
> > You can find the full proposal at:
> >
> >     https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-06
> >
> > and the draft document at:
> >
> >     https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-06/draft
> >
> > We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments
> > to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 27 November 2012.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Emilio Madaio
> > Policy Development Officer
> > RIPE NCC
> >
> >
> >