[address-policy-wg] An interesting policy question
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] An interesting policy question
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] LIRs with good / bad behavior
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lu Heng
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
Fri Dec 4 10:50:19 CET 2015
Hi Sander: Thanks for the reply and the discussion was started in one of the RIR meetings, and I am just asking community view(not official in any way of course) of this as part of globe view on the *need*, as it is an shared concept for every RIR. I think I have the answer I wanted here now and I appreciate everyone's input, if any future contribution or disagreement I still welcome of course, if you afraid generate noise in the list you are welcome to email me personally. But one thing I do hope is, don't let people afraid generate noise here in the list, let people ask dum question here, I come across quite few young people that really afraid to say anything in this list, just because they afraid to make mistake...this really isn't the case I hope. On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: > Hi Lu, > > > Thanks Vladislav for the clear answer. > > > > And for the list, this is an answer I would like to receive, clear and > easy. > > > > The example was very simple so I was expecting an simple answer as well. > > Glad you are happy with that answer. I just want to state for the record > that any answer on this topic given on this mailing list does not represent > any official interpretation of the policy and is as such non-authoritative > :) Official interpretations are only given in the Impact Analysis of a > policy proposal. > > > (I got an feeling that anything I say in the list was wrong, I hope it > does not become personal again, I am asking a policy question in a policy > discussion mailing list and nothing more than that). > > Nothing personal, and both Gert and I have answered your question as well > as we could. Things are more complex than this answer shows though. For > example changing the geographical location by itself might not make the > 'need' invalid, but any changes in who/what the addresses are connected to > might etc. These things are determined on a case-by-case basis by the > hostmasters/IPRAs. > > That is why we don't discuss specific cases on the mailing list. A mailing > list never has the full data, and speculating what hostmasters would decide > would undermine their work. We have an arbitration system for cases where > people disagree. > > Cheers, > Sander > > -- -- Kind regards. Lu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151204/5c75c0be/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] An interesting policy question
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] LIRs with good / bad behavior
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]