[address-policy-wg] IPv4 reserved space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 reserved space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** Re: IPv4 reserved space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sergey
gforgx at fotontel.ru
Mon Jun 13 19:56:27 CEST 2016
You have already been pointed at: https://version6.ru/isp. My, perhaps too optimistic prognosis, is that we'll have IPv6 as a mainstream IP protocol by 2018. The figures of the current growth make me believe in this. On 06/13/16 20:04, NTX NOC wrote: > Agree, > > Almost in Russia, very big country with a lot of ISPs - I can't find any > big home ISP who gives IPv6 by default. > Most of ISPs get there Ipv6 blocks and play with it. But it's not so > good for customers. ISPs prefer still to get IPv4 blocks in additional > to the space they have but not to switch to IPv6. > > IPv6 will grow very slow in additional with IPv4. > So those protocols will live together for long-long time and we need to > spend some time for IPv4 as well. > > > Yuri > > On 12.06.2016 18:30, Arash Naderpour wrote: >> As an example in Iran there is only one exit point (AS12880 and AS48159 >> belongs to one organization) from country to global carriers controlled >> by government and as they have no LI platform yet on IPv6 there is >> simply no IPv6 service availability or possibility for Iranian service >> providers. >> >> >> >> There is no possibility to have a direct peering with a global carrier >> and as a result no native IPv6 connectivity yet. there is also no IXP >> in the country. >> >> >> >> As I said it is not about the difficulty of deploying IPv6, when it is >> not lawful and is not available to ISPs they have to stick with IPv4. >> Please refer to ripe ncc lab report and see some IPv4 import figures >> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/wilhelm/developments-in-ipv4-transfers >> >> >> >> Arash >> >> P.S last month they started advertising of the IPv6 blocks but no plan >> to provide a service to ISPs as yet. >> >> >> >> *From:*address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] *On >> Behalf Of *Sergey >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 June 2016 1:10 AM >> *To:* address-policy-wg at ripe.net >> *Subject:* Re: [address-policy-wg] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** Re: >> IPv4 reserved space >> >> >> >> Global carriers provide that connectivity. What's the problem? >> >> On 06/12/16 18:08, Arash Naderpour wrote: >> >> I was not talking about a global carrier and if they can provide >> IPv6 or not, It was about availability and possibilities to have >> IPv6 connectivity everywhere. There are two different subject. >> >> >> >> Arash >> >> >> >> *From:*Dominik Nowacki [mailto:dominik at clouvider.co.uk] >> *Sent:* Monday, 13 June 2016 12:42 AM >> *To:* Arash Naderpour <arash_mpc at parsun.com> >> <mailto:arash_mpc at parsun.com> >> *Cc:* Alexander Koeppe <Alexander.Koeppe at merckgroup.com> >> <mailto:Alexander.Koeppe at merckgroup.com>; address-policy-wg at ripe.net >> <mailto:address-policy-wg at ripe.net> >> *Subject:* Re: [address-policy-wg] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** >> Re: IPv4 reserved space >> >> >> >> Not available ? >> >> >> >> Please name a global carrier that does not support IPv6. >> >> With Kind Regards, >> >> Dominik Nowacki >> >> Clouvider Limited is a limited company registered in England and >> Wales. Registered number: 08750969 <tel:08750969>. Registered >> office: 88 Wood Street, London, United Kingdom, EC2V 7RS. Please >> note that Clouvider Limited may monitor email traffic data and also >> the content of email for the purposes of security and staff >> training. This message contains confidential information and is >> intended only for the intended recipient. If you do not believe you >> are the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or >> copy this e-mail. Please notify abuse at clouvider.net >> <mailto:abuse at clouvider.net> of this e-mail immediately by e-mail if >> you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from >> your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure >> or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, >> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Clouvider >> Limited nor any of its employees therefore does not accept liability >> for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which >> arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is >> required please request a hard-copy version. >> >> >> On 12 Jun 2016, at 16:40, Arash Naderpour <arash_mpc at parsun.com >> <mailto:arash_mpc at parsun.com>> wrote: >> >> And I don't understand why some people think that everyone can >> deploy IPv6, >> it is simply not available everywhere. >> It is not about difficulty, it is about possibility. >> >> Regards, >> >> Arash >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: address-policy-wg >> [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On >> Behalf Of Alexander Koeppe >> Sent: Monday, 13 June 2016 12:09 AM >> To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net <mailto:address-policy-wg at ripe.net> >> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** >> Re: IPv4 >> reserved space >> >> I don't understand how much time and energy is being put into >> the discussion >> about keeping vintage IP alive. >> This time and energy would be better off spent in just deploying v6. >> It's just not that difficult. You just need to develop a >> stepwise approach. >> A one-shot would probably fail. >> >> -- Alex >> >> >> >> >> Am 11.06.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Gert Doering <gert at space.net >> <mailto:gert at space.net>>: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:14:11PM +0300, NTX NOC wrote: >> >> About IPv6 - still now in Russia there are no Home ISPs >> who gives >> >> IPv6 by default to customers. Nobody wants it, nobody >> needs it. >> >> >> >> The "nobody needs it" is a misconception. Direct your >> energy there to >> >> make people understand that IPv4 is game over. >> >> >> >> Gert Doering >> >> -- NetMaster >> >> -- >> >> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? >> >> >> >> SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. >> Bomhard >> >> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. >> >> Grundner-Culemann >> >> >> D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) >> >> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 >> >> <totemomail_info.html> >> >> >> >> This message and any attachment are confidential and may be >> privileged or >> otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended >> recipient, >> you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the >> contents to any >> other person. If you have received this transmission in error, >> please notify >> the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachment >> from your >> system. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its >> subsidiaries do not >> accept liability for any omissions or errors in this message >> which may arise >> as a result of E-Mail-transmission or for damages resulting from any >> unauthorized changes of the content of this message and any >> attachment >> thereto. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its >> subsidiaries do not >> guarantee that this message is free of viruses and does not >> accept liability >> for any damages caused by any virus transmitted therewith. >> >> >> >> Click http://www.merckgroup.com/disclaimer to access the German, >> French, >> Spanish and Portuguese versions of this disclaimer. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Kind regards, >> CTO at >> *Foton Telecom CJSC (ru.fotontelecom)* >> Tel.: +7 (499) 679-99-99 >> AS42861 on PeeringDB <http://as42861.peeringdb.com/>, Qrator >> <https://radar.qrator.net/as42861>, BGP.HE.NET <http://bgp.he.net/AS42861> >> >> http://ipv6actnow.org/ >> -- Kind regards, CTO at *Foton Telecom CJSC (ru.fotontelecom)* Tel.: +7 (499) 679-99-99 AS42861 on PeeringDB <http://as42861.peeringdb.com/>, Qrator <https://radar.qrator.net/as42861>, BGP.HE.NET <http://bgp.he.net/AS42861> http://ipv6actnow.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160613/4e3c9d90/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 reserved space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** Re: IPv4 reserved space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]