[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Wed May 11 09:02:33 CEST 2016
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > you may find reading the actual last /8 policy informative. > >> Last /8 is not really get affected by this policy. >> - Additional /22 IPv4 allocations can be only provided from address space >> outside 185/8 > > this is misleading or just sadly misinformed > > last /8 is not an address range, it is a state reached once the ncc had > only that address range and continues on irrespective of additions or > subtractions of space to the ncc's pool. minor correction, it is a state that was reached once IANA allocated the last /8 to all the RIR's, and it affect _all_ address space after that point. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]