[address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Sun Sep 24 20:44:21 CEST 2017
Hi, > Op 24 sep. 2017, om 20:42 heeft Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> het volgende geschreven: > >>>> They are beyond help >>> >>> not at all. the vendors are more than happy to sell them CGNs, and >>> other NATs of many flavors. >> >> Sorry, I should have specified "from a IPv4 allocation policy point of >> view" :) > > sorry. but having spent blood and tears on ipv6 deployment for over 20 > years, watching ipv6 zealots create a massive NAT market really really > hurts. Indeed :( Sander -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20170924/701b84ae/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2017-03, New Policy Proposal (Reducing Initial IPv4 Allocation, aiming to preserve a minimum of IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]