[address-policy-wg] do we need a policy for avoiding "multiple unjustified LIRs"?

Hello Jordi,

Thank you for your question.

The policy proposal 2018-01, "Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 
Policy" agreed upon by the Address Policy WG gave a clear mandate to the 
RIPE NCC to allocate IPv6 resources per LIR, regardless of whether it is 
a single or multiple LIR account.
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2018-01

As I pointed out yesterday during my presentation, the collection of 
IPv6 allocations via multiple LIR accounts appears to conflict with some 
of the goals of the IPv6 policy. However, as was generally agreed 
yesterday during the Address Policy WG session, it might be time to 
review these goals. This could be one way forward to provide guidance to 
the RIPE NCC about how we should handle requests for additional IPv6 
allocations from parties that already have large IPv6 blocks and no 
clear reason for requesting additional IPv6 allocations.

Regarding your suggestion concerning opening multiple LIR accounts, this 
would be something for the RIPE NCC membership and the Executive Board 
to discuss. As you indicated, defining reasonable boundaries between 
justified and unjustified might be a challenge.

Kind regards,
Marco Schmidt
Assistant Manager Registry Services
RIPE NCC

On 24/11/2021 11:14, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote:
> Not acting is a path for abuse and stockpiling. Not fair and we must resolve it avoiding it as much as possible.
>
>   
> Regards,
> Jordi
> @jordipalet
>   
>   
>
> El 23/11/21 11:59, "address-policy-wg en nombre de Staff" <address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de policy at ntx.ru> escribió:
>
>      Hello everybody,
>
>      Of cause no.
>
>      That will not help. always possible to avoid.
>      Doing more complex polices is not good way. NCC had already lot of
>      issues with that.
>      Does any body remember how they asked to use email with the name to use
>      in their database and people should change emails lot of times to
>      sutisfy NCC.... We did  a lot of noise and NCC canceled it. Brr...
>
>      If people request space - then they need it and they select this way to
>      get it with NCC.
>
>      This is normal process. No rush here. NCC should work as usual.
>
>      Yury
>
>
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg