[address-policy-wg] 2023-04 Are anonymised assignment objects valid?

Fri Sep 29 15:46:20 CEST 2023

denis walker wrote on 28/09/2023 11:31:
> We are talking about one sentence in the current address policy that
> this proposal removes.

that's ok: the RIPE Community is entitled to voice an opinion on 
changing RIPE policy.

If this policy nullifies the requirement to register end-user PA 
assignments in the RIPE DB, I don't necessarily view this as a bad 
thing, given the poor quality of the existing data, and the fact that 
fixing this is - whether we accept this or not - a largely intractable 
problem.

That said, it's important that any change of this scope should be done 
with the community's eyes open so that we can make an informed decision 
based on merit.

Nick