[address-policy-wg] 2023-04 Review Phase (Add AGGREGATED-BY-LIR status for IPv4 PA assignments)

Dear Jan!

As mentioned in my previous e-mail: Would you please post the section of 
the policy that you belive has the NCC's interpretation differ from the 
actual wording/language used?

Because i have yet to find a section that states explicitly what is 
considered valid vs invalid contact information (other than being out of 
date or information that does not provide a contact to the user in a 
timely manner). Or a section that restricts what kind of data is 
permissable for "contact information".

Kind Regards



On 1/12/24 07:25, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> I also do not understand what makes it so hard to say that: "Yes, the 
> current policy does state something else than NCC's interpretation of 
> it does, and therefore current practice contradicts (or appears to 
> contradict) policy. However, we, the proposers, believe that the 
> current practice makes for the best policy, and therefore propose 
> amending the policy to reflect practice."