[anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
furio ercolessi
furio+as at spin.it
Tue Apr 6 19:26:20 CEST 2010
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:52:43PM +0200, Jogi Hofm?ller wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 04:45:18PM +0100, Brian Nisbet wrote: > > >>>> How can not anybody have an idea, how to solve the problem ? > >>> > >>> Many people have many ideas, not all of them work. There remains no > >>> silver bullet. And any recommendation made still needs to be adopted. > >> > >> I just discribed one arround launch time. > >> RIPE should urged all members to stop spam originating from their networks. > > Sure, once we agree on a definition for spam, that COULD work fine. Is there a disagreement on this point ? I thought it was "unsolicited+bulk" (as in http://www.spamhaus.org/definition.html ) and that this definition was quite universally accepted in the industry. furio
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]