[anti-abuse-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Tue Nov 9 12:04:11 CET 2010
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:54:31PM +0100, Tobias Knecht wrote: Hi > This gives more flexibility to the ISPs. Think about business ISPs > delegating a /24 to a customer and this customer wants to do his own > abuse handling. Yes such customers really exists ;-) Today this is a > huge problem and creates more trouble for NOCs than helping them or > their abuse department. I'm pretty much sure that a lot of LIRs will make a script to create irt objects basing on actual whois data. That's why and because there are so many inetnum objects in the DB I have mixed feelings about that proposal. I think that we can do something bit different - we can make irt objects mandatory for new object types (INET-REG, INET6-REG and AS-REG). Of course if those new object types will be eventually implemented. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]