Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Previous message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Next message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Wed Aug 10 16:30:14 CEST 2011
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" wrote the following on 10/08/2011 15:26: > Hi > > I would be happy to focus on what Pepijn proposed, and what Brian > Nisbet promised to take to the NCC - detailed stats on LIR audits. In relation to this, as an update, I started talking to the NCC about this. I don't know when I'll have an answer right now, but hopefully I shall have some more information for you tomorrow. > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Leo Vegoda<leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote: >> >> Focusing on the definitions issue, it would be useful to have an agreed set of definitions for some of the terms used. Is there a commonly agreed list? Leo, that is a... complicated conversation at best. While I agree that more clarity and coherence would be very useful, what definitions are you actually looking for? Brian.
- Previous message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Next message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]