[anti-abuse-wg] Proposal for technical details for abuse contact information in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal for technical details for abuse contact information in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal for technical details for abuse contact information in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Adrian
ripe-wg-antiabuse at kyubu.de
Thu Dec 1 15:58:34 CET 2011
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 03:24:05PM +0100, Frank Gadegast wrote: hi, > You forgot about bigger ISPs that likes to report abuse > automatically in standarized formats (and what most abuse departments > really LIKE to receive). True, but this is an orthogonal problem. > An unrestricted abuse contact really helps here a lot. Like, the abuse mailbox defined in RFC 2142? > But to be honest: no restriction helps that your email > address ends up in a spammers list, they have more Adding arbitrary restrictions doesn't prevent that either. > power you can dream of (I even heared that they pay > people to enter captcha codes). Yes. Cheers, Adrian
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal for technical details for abuse contact information in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal for technical details for abuse contact information in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]