[anti-abuse-wg] Privacy requirements, was Spam FAQs
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Privacy requirements, was Spam FAQs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Sat Dec 17 13:23:34 CET 2011
On 16/Dec/11 22:32, russ at consumer.net wrote: > Security and privacy are things that need to be balanced so it is > not off-topic to discuss privacy requirements for abuse systems. The subject is on topic indeed. It has various facets, including unlimited access to abuse-mailboxes, anonymity of IP delegations, and possibly even redaction of spam complaints. For IP numbers, a privacy requirement is necessary to avoid tracking users. However, there has to be an exception for mail delivery (not submission). IIRC there is an exception for e-commerce, that limits a merchant's right to anonymity. Likewise, mail servers shouldn't be allowed to be anonymous. Most EU concerns are discussed within the coordination-wg, though. So I'm not clear on the worthiness of having this discussion here. jm2c
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Spam FAQs need revision, was 2011-06 New Policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Privacy requirements, was Spam FAQs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]