[anti-abuse-wg] Re: Interaction between the RIPE and anti-abuse communities, was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Interaction between the RIPE and anti-abuse communities, was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Interaction between the RIPE and anti-abuse communities, was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Feb 2 14:07:57 CET 2011
Hi, On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 05:59:29PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > 1. As a post mortem So how much effort do we want to make (read: should the LIRs pay) on a dead horse? > 2. To possibly stop those same entities from acquiring v6 blocks? If these entities are legitimate businesses according to their national law, if the RIPE NCC will *not* give them addresses, we're going to have large problems (anti-monopoly laws, etc.). The situation is quite clear if a LEA shows up and states "these are criminals", and the RIPE policy takes that into account (withdraw addresses). Now, how do you know upfront that a new business is criminal, as defined by applicable law? "Is run by a well-known spammer" might be clear to you and me, but is it clear enough from a *legal* perspective? Gert Doering -- did you enable IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 306 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20110202/0c6645e3/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Interaction between the RIPE and anti-abuse communities, was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Interaction between the RIPE and anti-abuse communities, was Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]