[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Tue Mar 8 17:33:43 CET 2011
On Mar 8, 2011, at 7:48 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote: >> >> "descr:" is free form text and trying to impose a structure on that kind of field after a couple of decades is probably not a route to success. > > Please note, I didn't say "structure". I said "accuracy". At least > to the extent of "Broadband IP space" not being equal to "IPs used for > email marketing" Both could be true, although that would probably be the best choice. However, as we approach the point where obtaining IPv4 address space becomes more difficult I think we will have to accept that individual IPv4 addresses will share role much more frequently. Regards, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]