[anti-abuse-wg] draft policy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] draft policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] draft policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rob Evans
rhe at nosc.ja.net
Wed Mar 9 17:30:27 CET 2011
> I defny vote for that RIPE drafts should only be discussed > by RIPE members and that a 50% votes of RIPE members are enough > to accept a draft. Therein lies stagnation, but perhaps that is what you're aiming for? Assuming you mean RIPE NCC members (anybody can be a member of RIPE, it is just a community, and your guess as to the number of members of the community is as good as anybody's), then when I looked a couple of years ago, 2% of RIPE NCC members voted for the members of the NCC's executive board. 2%. How many of the members do you think get actively involved in policy discussions? (Hint: it is much less than 50%.) All of the RIRs have open policy discussion forums, just as the IETF has no members and anybody can contribute to the Internet's standards. Good luck changing that. :) Rob
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] draft policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] draft policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]