[anti-abuse-wg] Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 10 09:21:07 CET 2011
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: > > BTW: spam farms are usally not a big technical problem, because > its easy to detect ranges with spam outbreaks. More problematic > are all those unprotected PCs out there with daily changing IP. > Its not a "technical" problem in that a smtp block or a nullroute solves it for you Now picture what happens when the ISP turfs whatever spammer got a /14 from them, or the RIR revokes a /20 that is full of malware C&C .. and then, months later, its reassigned to someone else. I would invite you to go explain how easy or difficult a technical problem it is, to whichever poor SOB gets that netblock. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]