[anti-abuse-wg] Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks, was Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 10 10:16:00 CET 2011
You do. We have something on very similar lines. I'm willing to bet that several networks (ranging from ISPs to large corporations) have filters that date back to a decade ago, but were never removed. No, that wouldn't be a good bet to make when I know that for a fact. thanks -suresh On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: > We remove blocked IP ranges or addresses automatically on a regular > base. Our statistics show, that spam only "outbreaks" for a couple > of days from specific IPs and that we detect new outbreaks quick enough. > We remove dynamic single IPs after a week automatically, when they were > added automatically. > And we remove manually added bigger blocks after 3 months. > > We also offer a webpage anybody can reach to remove IPs from our > blacklist easily without any further "excuse" or "procedure". > With just one simply click. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks, was Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]