[anti-abuse-wg] LIR membership, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] LIR membership, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] LIR membership, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Thu Mar 10 14:26:38 CET 2011
* Shane Kerr: > Tricky. The RIPE NCC is a membership organization - the LIRs are the > owners. Right now the membership process is really easy, but membership > does not automatically get you an allocation. I think it basically does, for IPv6. > You still have to justify your first allocation, and then justify > the assignments within your allocation when you want to use the > space. For creating the route object, allocation is sufficient. It's difficult to introduce the right level of barriers because we need to walk a fine line between preventing devaluation of RIPE address space and forming a cartel which excludes potential competitors. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] LIR membership, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] LIR membership, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]