[anti-abuse-wg] Re: Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 10 15:25:53 CET 2011
Where there is apparent fraud, it might make sense to penalize the LIR if they are complicit in this. I do have my doubts about the *current* need for an LIR, to be frank (as opposed to an ISP that acquires a large IP block and swips it to their downstream customers) On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote: > The RIPE NCC is currently finishing implementing a newish requirement > that PI blocks have a contract with either the RIPE NCC or with an LIR. > Based on this is should be possible to revoke misused PI space (where > "misuse" is defined as "not being used for the purpose assigned under", > *not* defined as "being used for things I do not like"). > > In theory that policy already exists for all RIPE NCC space, I think. Do > you think we should try to push for the RIPE NCC to actually implement > this policy? Do you think there should be further penalties for LIRs > involved with arranging bogus PI assignments? -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: Policy proposal: closing allocation/assignment window, was Policy disallowing spam from RIPE blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]