[anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Apr 25 09:11:49 CEST 2012
Given that frank gadegast posted something about like 15 of their abuse addresses not working .. thank you but no thanks, I'll take a raincheck :) On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Piotr Strzyzewski <Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl> wrote: > > I have no idea. I have found this in less specific inetnum object: > > inetnum: 89.67.0.0 - 89.74.255.255 > netname: UPC-PL > descr: UPC Polska Sp. z o.o. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-contact is not going to fly unless we get all the legitimate players adopting it first
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]