[anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
chrish at consol.net
chrish at consol.net
Thu Jan 12 14:40:51 CET 2012
Hi! On 01/12/2012 01:54 PM, Frank Gadegast wrote: > You will have no access restrictions for the abuse contact anymore > and the new abuse-c will be filled in a very short period because > it will be mandatory. The addresses entered into our ripe objects are not private data. They are public addresses for the purpose of ripe-stuff. Following your idea abuse-cs would always be copies of the admin-c. A reasonable approach towards what seems to be your communicated aim would be: Drop all *-c in favour of a single contact, which is meant as contact for ripe-stuff. This is of course public as it's meant that way. In case you actually wish for the possibility of multiple, specific contacts, the straightforward and all-compatible solution would be to add optional further specific contact data - that may be used by people who wish to direct mail to different specific addresses. Translated into the current state that would be: use an optional abuse-mailbox attribute (if this were mandatory, our objects would always just hold a copy of the e-mail attribute). > But maybe they will not find them attractiv at all, because they > know, that they will only reach professionals there, that can easily > seperated spam from good mail and that are trained not to click > every link in an email ;o) Yeah, that will certainly teach them. > But anyway: it will be possible to protect personal contacts much > better in the future, if the proposal gets through, because access Sorry, but it's just a stupid idea to put private data into public databases. Regards, Chris
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Status of 2011-06
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]