[anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Gadegast
ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de
Tue Jul 31 16:07:37 CEST 2012
Leo Vegoda wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > On Jul 31, 2012, at 6:33 am, Tobias Knecht <tk at abusix.com> wrote: > > […] > >> No. We had that conversations already and decided not to accept web >> addresses only. The reason is, that automatic reporting can not be done >> with web addresses. > > Assuming you mean something accessible over HTTP or HTTPS, it does not have to be accessed by a person using a browser. If there was a widely adopted API, I can see the value in a URL for some kind of RESTful service for automatic reports that do not require human involvement. > Another point for the abuse-c. It can be enhanced. An optional abuse-url field is really a good idea, if there would be an standarized ARAPI (Abuse Report API ?) > Regards, > > Leo Vegoda > Kind regards, Frank -- MOTD: "have you enabled SSL on a website or mailbox today ?" -- PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank at powerweb.de Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 ======================================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]