[anti-abuse-wg] whois 5C's
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] whois 5C's
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] whois 5C's
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 29 14:14:06 CEST 2012
There's rather a big difference between access to bulk whois data of any sort for security or other "internet community" related, NON COMMERCIAL purposes, versus bulk whois data to run a commercial service. On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:40 PM, russ at consumer.net <russ at consumer.net>wrote: > The proposal about the 5 C's sounds good except you also have to include > whois access policies. If you can't get to the data easily and be able to > use it it is of no good. Right now there is a complicated patchwork of > whois access policies. Most of them were made up by a small group of > people who really don't consider all the issues. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20120329/db48da3c/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] whois 5C's
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] whois 5C's
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]