[anti-abuse-wg] central whois
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Benedikt Stockebrand
bs at stepladder-it.com
Fri Jun 28 12:18:42 CEST 2013
Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> writes: > Sad, but how can you submit a death threat to a role persons (object) ? As e-mail. >> If you make looking up the admin-c for an address as easy as some people > > No, not the admin-c, the abuse contact email addresses, that are > already published ... Sorry, that was a typo. Same problem, however. > Only the abuse email address published by the ISPs or resource holder > will be available. > Its up to every resource holder to publish, what he thinks whats accurate. > Usally a role address like abuse at sitename.de or so ... The reason why I am so wary about this is because at that time you'd have to have a real person, with name and phone number, listed as admin-c. Things have improved since then, partly due to the introduction of abuse-c. Nevertheless, the actual problem with the idea about abuse-c being too easily accessible still remains: People who don't really know what they are doing will find that interface and cause additional work to the people on the receiving end of the abuse-c mail queue. -- Business Grade IPv6 Consulting, Training, Projects Benedikt Stockebrand, Dipl.-Inform. http://www.stepladder-it.com/
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] central whois
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]