[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE WHOIS blocked
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE WHOIS blocked
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE WHOIS blocked
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fredrik Widell
fredrik at resilans.se
Mon Nov 17 23:00:08 CET 2014
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Use the -r flag for your queries to avoid beeing blocked, you have requested to many person-objects probably. > > > Apparently, somebody @ RIPE NCC thinks that I have been too curious of late. > > How long should it take for this error to go away? > > ============================================================================= > % This is the RIPE Database query service. > % The objects are in RPSL format. > % > % The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions. > % See http://www.ripe.net/db/support/db-terms-conditions.pdf > > %ERROR:201: access denied for 69.62.255.118 > % > % Queries from your IP address have passed the daily limit of controlled objects. > % Access from your host has been temporarily denied. > % For more information, see > % http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/faq/faq-db/why-did-you-receive-the-error-201-access-denied > > % This query was served by the RIPE Database Query Service version 1.76 (DB-2) > ============================================================================= > > > I have already written to ripe-dbm at ripe.net asking about this and have > received no reply. > > And anyway, can anyone here explain to me what the point is of limiting > WHOIS queries based on the source IP address? > > As far as I can see, this only has the effect of slowing down or blocking > the work of legitimate researchers, such as myself. Anybody who knows > anything about the Internet should know that an IP-address based throttling > system would be almost entirely ineffective against anyone who was seriously > determined to perform bulk harvesting of the RIPE data base via port 43 > (or via port 80 for that matter). > > It seems that I am being slowed down, blocked, and penalized for the sin > of having a static IP address, even while any other fool on the planet > who has a dynamically-assigned broadband IP, or even a dial-up line, > and who knows how to disconnect an reconnect can easily slurp all of > the RIPE data they want, with no real limits. > > In what universe is this non-stupid? > > More to the point, who is it, specifically, within RIPE NCC, that has > the authority to fix this? > > > Regards, > rfg > > > P.S. More stupidity: Based on the text at the URL provided in the > error mesage (see above) the goal of the rate limiting seems to be to > prevent harvesters from collecting too much "contact information". > OK. Fine. But the text on that web page also says that using the > -r option with the WHOIS queries will prevent such contact information > from being returned, thus eliminating the issue... or so one would > think. > > But why then is it the case that once my IP address has hit its head > against this daily limit, I am not even allowed anymore to even make > any more ``safe'' queries with the -r option? I am now locked out > completely. Why? > > Sigh. I guess that I need to go and drag my old 96Kb modem down out > of the closet, dust it off, and get myself a free dial-up AOL account > so that I can work around all of this stupidity. > > > -- Mvh Fredrik Widell Resilans AB http://www.resilans.se/ mail: info at resilans.se , fredrik at resilans.se
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE WHOIS blocked
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE WHOIS blocked
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]