[anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Mar 3 10:51:03 CET 2016
> there has to be accurate records for abuse-c really? and how does abuse-c affect the effective operation of the ncc resource registry. abuse-c is a convenience for ops. > many network managers do not respond/reply to abuse, this does not > mean that the complaints are not actioned, for example > *abuse at google.com is a black hole great idea. i will make my abuse-c:s be blackhole at bogus.com randy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [db-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]