[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Review Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Review Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Review Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Mon Jul 20 16:34:58 CEST 2020
Petrit Hasani wrote on 20/07/2020 14:07: > As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this > four week Review Phase is to continue discussion of the proposal, > taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full > draft RIPE Policy Document. This is the second most damning impact analysis I've seen the RIPE NCC write about any proposal, after 2019-03. The takeaways are roughly this: - up to 10x the number of tickets annually - ~10x the current number of staff required to handle the workload - the NCC will not enforce parts of the policy - ~3 months of retooling required Would it be possible for someone in the RIPE NCC to provide a reasonable cost estimate for hiring the 10x number of Registration Services personnel for the first 12 months of operation? A back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that this will run into multiples of millions of €. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Review Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Review Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]