[anti-abuse-wg] About "consensus" and "voting"...
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] About "consensus" and "voting"...
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] About "consensus" and "voting"...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Sat May 9 23:28:50 CEST 2020
Hi everyone, On Sat, 9 May 2020, Sander Steffann wrote: > Hi Randy, > >>> Otherwise we change the way the working Groups works it will remain >>> unchanged for ever. I agree that we must get a way to vote or another >>> democratic way to get decisions. >> (...) >> >> for a large segment of the community, and that which was pretty much >> the original population, there is an underlying physics and shared >> experience of moving packets, routing, circuits, bgp, ixen, ... that >> gives us a common experience and understanding. I must note, however, that security is embedded inside "..." *sigh* Carlos
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] About "consensus" and "voting"...
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] About "consensus" and "voting"...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]