[anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John Levine
johnl at taugh.com
Sun Apr 7 19:44:45 CEST 2024
It appears that Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> said: >On Sat 06/Apr/2024 19:54:27 +0200 Randy Bush wrote: >>>>> Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number >>>>> assignment? >>>> Because your ISP can't be bothered. >>> Is such unbotherability legitimate? >RIPE could at least reproach those LIRs that have an inet6num but no rDNS >delegation to it. RIPE does what its members want it to do. If they don't care about rDNS, so be it. If you care about rDNS, you need to find a better ISP that meets your needs. Then tell the old one why you left. R's, John
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]