Operational Contacts
- Previous message (by thread): Operational Contacts
- Next message (by thread): Operational Contacts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arnold Nipper
nipper at ira.uka.de
Thu Oct 22 17:36:31 CET 1992
>The following is my recollection of the Paris discussion about this: > >Andreas Schachtner had proposed to add an attribute to all non-person >objects specifying the mailbox of the operational contact points. >This had been mailed around on ripe-op before the Paris meeting. > >The proposal was discussed and a separate NOC object was proposed in >order to prevent duplication of the same data all over the database >and have a better mapping with reality. This was considered a too >heavyweight soloution for the time being. > We should soon introduce this new NOC object. If for example a service provider wants to give support to all his customer networks, all three attributes have to be added to a lot of networks. And then the phone number changes ... Don't waste time. >Consensus was to add separate optional attributes to all objects except >persons for e-mail, phone and fax of the operational contacts. If this >gets widely used then introduction of a NOC object and replacement of >these attributes by a pointer to it can be considered at a later stage. > >I propose the following naming: > > ATTR op op-phone > ATTR of op-fax > ATTR om op-mail > >All optional and multiple. > >Semantics: > > Generic contact information for operational purposes like a > common mailbox for the NOC or operations group and/or a > NOC hotline etc. > > Not intended for duplication of information that can be found > via the tc, ac, and zc persons! > >Comments? > >Daniel Arnold
- Previous message (by thread): Operational Contacts
- Next message (by thread): Operational Contacts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]