AW: [db-wg] Organisation object proposal

Hi David, 

> 
> I don't understand why we need yet another object that has very
> simular functionality as the role/person object.
> 
> Why don't we fix the role object if there is a problem with the role
> object ?!? Or, why don't we retire the role object and replace it with
> an organization object. Adding yet another object, while keeping a
> deficient object seems not the best route to me. Let's first fix what
> we have or get rid of it before we start adding new objects.
> 
> Having three different objects that all have very simular but not
> exactly the same functionality will only add to the confusion. 
> 
> Yes, you can keep adding objects for all kind of special needs, but
> there comes a point where it's impossible for regular humans to deal
> with the database because they don't understand the fine differences
> of all the different contact objects and special obscure attributes.
> 
> David K.
> ---

I fully agree with your comment

Martin

----------------------------
Martin VYSKOCIL
Telekom Austria AG
Broadband Networks & Services

Tel.: +43 59059 1 43429
FAX: +43 59059 1 43492
mailto:mvyskocil at highway.telekom.at