[db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
MarcoH
marcoh at marcoh.net
Wed Apr 14 15:13:22 CEST 2004
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 06:23:24PM +0200, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > >As a starting point, let's take (approximations to) MarcoH's RIPE-47 > >statistics. > > > >Number of inet[6]num objects: > > 10**6 > >Number of inet[6]num objects with IRT: > > 10**3 (not significant) > > This simple counting approach is potentially VERY misleading, as it is > not the sheer _number_ of individual entries which should be counted, > but the _size_ of the address blocks covered in this hierarchy. > > On top of that, there's the possibiltiy to use the hierarchy to e.g. > provide a "1st-line" contact for an individual address block AND a > fallback or upstream for the encompassing block. > > Marco, would it be reasonably easy for you to extract this additional > piece of statistics data? Sure, although it will probably take some time as I'm kinda busy these days. To be sure, last meeting I had the count on the number of inet(6)num objects having a mnt-irt and the number having a remarks: *abuse* attribute. The request is to extend this on the actual number of IP-addresses covered by both methods ? I will try to extend my script (grep | wc -l) a bit to get this info, hopefully during next weekend but at least in time for the next meeting. Grtx, MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]