[db-wg] abuse-c
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastian Abt
sabt at sabt.net
Tue Jan 13 17:11:18 CET 2004
Hi Christian, * "Christian Rasmussen" <chr at jay.net> wrote: > Okay, this was discussed yesterday and we talked about a combination > of what Daniel Karrenberg suggested and the above, meaning you just > add an optional abuse attribute to the inetnum objects, if its not > added the abuse address will "default" to the abuse address of the > maintainer object. Wouldn't this work for you? Yes, of course, that would be pretty okay. > Im not sure why it should be multiple? But I think most of us on this > list can agree with you that a valid abuse email address associated > with each inetnum in the database would be very welcome. That's quite simple: I'd like to insert my customers abuse desk as well as my own abuse desk to at least keep track of any incidents. regards, sebastian -- whois: sabt-ripe - phone: +49 (0)160 90759764 email: sabt at sabt.net - pgp-pubkey: 0xD008DA9C
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]