[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Thu Jan 29 14:38:17 CET 2004
I can also live with the value of the attribute being either a reference or a mailbox directly. In the latter case I suggest that the name should not end on -c to prevent confusion. In <20040112074509.GC2101 at arbeit.karrenberg.net> I wrote: > I am also in favour of adding the 'abuse-mailbox' attribute to the > maintainer object in order to provide a quick way for deployment that > does not involve changing a lot of inet*num objects. The referencing > recommendation should be: "If the inet*num object for the address > concerned has an 'abuse-mailbox', use this address *only* for sending > abuse complaints. If such an attribute is not present, check the > maintainer object for an 'abuse-mailbox' attribute and use this address > *only* for sending abuse complaints." Would you consider including that in your proposal? Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]