[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ulrich Kiermayr
ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at
Thu Jan 29 14:42:10 CET 2004
Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 12:56:48PM +0000, Randy Bush wrote: > >>>> o The inetnum: and inet6num: objects are enhanced with an optional >>>> attribute "abuse-c:". The value of the attribute is a nic-handle: >>>> which must refer to an extant person: or role: object. There may be >>>> zero or more abuse-c: attributes in an inet*num: object. >>> >>>I don't see any reason why abuse-c: should refer to person: or role: >>>object. Simple email address(es) would be imho just enough... >> >>i could live with that > > > Same here. Both would be fine. From the user's viewpoint yes, from the viewpoint of having to maintain the objects, I'd prefer a reference, because if the mailbox changes, you just have to maintain 1 Object and not n (for arbitrary positive integers of n) Just my 0.02EUR lG uk -- Ulrich Kiermayr Zentraler Informatikdienst der Universitaet Wien Network - Security - ACOnet-CERT Universitaetsstrasse 7, 1010 Wien, AT eMail: ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at Tel: (+43 1) 4277 / 14104 PGP Key-ID: 0xA8D764D8 Fax: (+43 1) 4277 / 9140
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]