[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Streater
tim.streater at dante.org.uk
Fri Jan 30 11:42:45 CET 2004
At 10:05 30/01/2004, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote: >MarcoH wrote: >>On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 10:26:17AM +0100, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote: >> >>>>'remarks: complaints to abuse@' also seem to scale to >10% of the inetnum >>>>objects. >>> >>>from am management level it seems so. But given the fact we are discussing it, it does not scale for the tool-writers. >>> >>>if i am wring, what is the discussion about? >> >>The fact remarks is a generic name and the field is freeform > >and therefore it does not scale? right? Remarks/comments fields should never be relied upon by anyone except the person entering the comments. -- Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]