[db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ulrich Kiermayr
ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at
Thu May 6 14:14:13 CEST 2004
Hi, > Adding a new reference to each primary requires updating each > primary. For me in UCD, this means several operations, as we have a > handful of inetnum objects, and just one inet6num. I expect it's not > all that different at UniVie. That is where the -c kicks in. and for a good solution, id prefer a shell -liner (similar to the one i presented in january) to update all these (at once). I think this is bearable for the NOCs that care. <cynical> and i fear, that those who don't would not do anything we'd like them to do </cynical> nevertheless as I stated in my proposal - adding the abuse-mailbox to person/role is not prohibited anyway - which then is used in admin-c/tech-c as well. lG uk -- Ulrich Kiermayr Zentraler Informatikdienst der Universitaet Wien Network - Security - ACOnet-CERT Universitaetsstrasse 7, 1010 Wien, AT eMail: ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at Tel: (+43 1) 4277 / 14104 PGP Key-ID: 0xA8D764D8 Fax: (+43 1) 4277 / 9140
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]