[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Wed Jul 3 08:48:25 CEST 2013
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:40:18PM +0200, Gilles Massen wrote: > I wouldn't want to challenge the policy process based on my inattention, > but considering that the policy text explicitely mentions inetnum and > aut-num, I never understood the proposed implementation as the only way, > only as a facilitating workaround to inetnum-referenced abuse-c. But > that's probably only me... no -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]