[db-wg] RIPE abuse finder
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE abuse finder
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE abuse finder
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Mar 6 14:46:51 CET 2013
Hi, On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 02:00:01PM +0100, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > There is no misunderstanding here at all. If you remove a maintainer > this just exposes the fact that indeed you do no longer consider > yourself responsible for maintaining these person objects. If no-one > else puts on their maintainer and assumes responsibility the object > is just unmaintained. But as long as a mnt-by: exists the assumption > has to be that the maintainer is indeed responsible to maintain the > data and indeed also for maintaining abuse contact information. > Note well that the mnt-by: attribute gives the maintainer the > authority to make changes. Yes - I feel responsible to update that person: object, if need arises. You are constructing a responsibility to handle network abuse coming from an inetnum: that happens to reference this person: object from this (which whould be logical to assume for the the mntner of an *inetnum:* object). This is what I'm objecting to. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 306 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20130306/24318dee/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE abuse finder
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] RIPE abuse finder
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]