[db-wg] AS-NULL

Mon Dec 15 17:13:47 CET 2014

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 04:05:14PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> For various reasons, the AS-NULL as-set scratched a rather pressing
> itch earlier today.
> 
> In the interests of neutrality, would the RIPE NCC be interested in
> maintaining ownership of this object as an empty set?

Can you elaborate on the use of AS-NULL? Isn't it common place to use
something like "NOT ANY"?

For what it's worth: I have no objections to RIPE maintaining an empty
AS-SET named AS-NULL.

Kind regards,

Job