[db-wg] Org-types
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Org-types
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Org-types
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Wöber
ww144 at mailbox.org
Wed Jan 20 16:49:18 CET 2021
Hi folks! On 20/01/2021 14:52, Gert Doering via db-wg wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:28:59PM +0100, Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote: >> I personally feel like marking the NCC as a member of itself is a bit odd, I agree, it does look a tad strange , but: >> but honestly this is so minor so I understand if it was just not considered >> much. > > While minor from a database issue, this was actually a fairly major issue > from an address policy point of view - we do have a special policy that > permits the NCC to assign addresses to itself, with the policy check being > done not by the hostmasters but by the board of arbiters (if I remember > correctly). You do! And we (the group of arbiters) did have 'interesting' discussions with the NCC, now and then. In the end all requests for 'self-assignments' were settled one way or another. I believe that this setup is -still - pretty nice and clever! > So yes, this is intentional... the NCC is member of the NCC, regarding > address space assignments. Indeed. Just to be clear, the NCC is not a member of itself from a contractual or business point of view, but from a (policy and) procedural point of view. > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > Regards, Wilfried -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20210120/e836fb40/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Org-types
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Org-types
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]