[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Thu Jan 17 19:42:43 CET 2008
* Leo Vegoda: >> The same as above. This would be an additional process, on top of the >> yearly fee, not a replacement. > > I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Could you elaborate, please? Yearly fee plus action from the RIPE NCC if someone presents proof that the contact details may be invalid. If the resource holder does not rectify the situation, sanctions comparable to those for lack of payment apply. > It's not all that hard. You can easily find all resources linked to an > LIR's Organisation ID in the whois database. You can do it easily on > the RIPE NCC's web site: > > http://www.ripe.net/whois?-r+-K+-i+org+ORG-NCC1-RIPE The org: field is optional, and it does not necessarily contain a pointer to the LIR.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]