[address-policy-wg] "Dirty" recycled network assigned
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "Dirty" recycled network assigned
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "Dirty" recycled network assigned
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Mon Jan 28 11:04:27 CET 2008
* Wilfried Woeber: >> You also need to rewrite Received: lines, to remove records of the >> supposedly infected address space. And you should do this on a separate >> server on a dedicated prefix, so that misguided blacklist operators do >> not retaliate against your main mail service for doing that. 8-( > > I really don't get that one :-) Which part? For certain mail relays, filter rules are applied to hosts behind it, not to the relay itself. > I suppose the NCC manufactures a completely fresh and shiny > address space object when giving out "previously used" address > space? They do. But blacklist operators do not seem to care. (Same for some routing database operators, BTW.) Apparently, it's also possible to wipe clean the record on your inetnum: objects, so it's understandable that the blacklist operators do not automatically wipe all the records from their databases just because the object appears to be new.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "Dirty" recycled network assigned
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "Dirty" recycled network assigned
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]