[address-policy-wg] Re: getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed May 4 09:19:36 CEST 2011
Hi, On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:41:55PM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote: > Assuming LIRs are generally businesses (first order approximation), LIRs > seem to be totally fine to pay for hardware to support all their > competitors DFZ deaggregation pollution. > > I'm missing any call to arms to get THAT in check. Different orders of magnitude. How many "ISP-like" operations can you have, and how many "just end users" can you have? So what we have tried to work for is a reasonable(*) balance - that end users *can* have independent address space, but not all end users would actually *want* it. To stress the obvious: not all "end users" are identical - there's "medium sized businesses" and "my mom's computer at home". I don't think my mom should have PI addresses being globally visible in the DFZ... (and as far as I remember, Daniel's employer isn't offering to route PI addresses to their customer base either). Just something to keep in mind. Gert Doering APWG chair (*) reasonable = some think it's too loose, others think it's too strict, but generally mostly workable and nothing has exploded yet -- did you enable IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]