[address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Sat May 7 09:39:46 CEST 2011
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Tore Anderson wrote: > Well, anyone can easily justify the need for an IPv6 /48 as that's the > minimum assignment size. The minimum IPv4 assignment size, on the other > hand, is smaller than a /24, which means that an applicant would require > 100s of devices on his network in order to to qualify for an IPv4 PI > assignment that can be actually routed on the internet. Wow, I thought <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-05> was already passed to take care of that. Seems I was wrong again. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]