[address-policy-wg] layer 10+ issues with 2008-08
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] layer 10+ issues with 2008-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] layer 10+ issues with 2008-08
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andreas Schachtner
andreas at schachtner.eu
Mon May 9 12:50:16 CEST 2011
Hi, Am Mon, 9 May 2011 11:05:31 +0100 schrieb Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com>: ... > However since Sander said the lawyer says there's no way the Dutch > courts could issue such a court order, this seems to be unrealistic > unless there's new legislation. Though I wonder about the EU Go and ask the lawyers if a court can order "effective measures" to stop a certain route being announced. This can be a filtering at AMS-IX and other exchanges, blocking it at a peer level or revoking a certificate. I a worst case szenarion, interpretation is up the the LEA and the NCC the most likely target. Regards, Andreas -- Andreas Schachtner afs Holding GmbH communication technologies & solutions http://afs-com.de/ Geschaeftsfuehrer Andreas Schachtner HRB 15448, Amtsgericht Dortmund
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] layer 10+ issues with 2008-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] layer 10+ issues with 2008-08
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]