[address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andreas Schachtner
andreas at schachtner.eu
Tue May 24 09:17:56 CEST 2011
Am Tue, 24 May 2011 08:13:54 +0200 schrieb Roger Jørgensen <rogerj at gmail.com>: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Suchy <danny at danysek.cz> > wrote: <snip> > ... > > I think you might missed the same fine point I did... RIPE NCC can > still return addresses to IANA and those addresses will not fall in > under the /8 rule? If IANA in such a case redistributes resources to the RIR, e.g. RIPE NCC, they will fall under the /8 policy as it is right now. BTW, I do support the proposal. Regards, Andreas -- Andreas Schachtner afs Holding GmbH communication technologies & solutions http://afs-com.de/ Geschaeftsfuehrer Andreas Schachtner HRB 15448, Amtsgericht Dortmund
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]