[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Oct 24 14:56:47 CEST 2011
Hi, On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:51:11PM +0200, Dan Luedtke wrote: > I am not a RIPE member (just a regular customer of a LIR), so I don't > know if I can propose a policy change, but I am sure you can. To propose policy change, you just need to be interested in RIPE policy making (and have an asbestos suit for some of the discussions). Regarding your proposal: please let's stick to proposal 2011-04 in this thread - changing the "subsequent allocation rule" is a different change and should be discussed in a separate thread. This is not meant to discourage that discussion, but to help people trying to follow the list archives to see what's related to 2011-04, and what's a new discussion. thanks, Gert Doering -- WG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]